The Big Time by Fritz
Leiber
Published: Galaxy
Science Fiction, 1957
Awards Won: Hugo
Award
The Book:
“Have
you ever worried about your memory, because it doesn't seem to recall exactly
the same past from one day to the next? Have you ever thought that the whole
universe might be a crazy, mixed-up dream? If you have, then you've had hints
of the Change War.
It's been going on for a billion years
and it will last another billion or so. Up and down the timeline, the two
sides--"Spiders" and "Snakes"--battle endlessly to change
the future and the past. Our lives, our memories, are their battleground. And
in the midst of the war is the Place, outside space and time, where Greta
Forzane and the other Entertainers provide solace and r-&-r for tired time
warriors.” ~WWend.com
This is my second-to-last novel for WWend’s 2012 GrandMaster’s Reading Challenge. Fritz
Leiber was an author with a wide-ranging imagination, who applied his skill to
many kinds of speculative fiction.
He wrote a number of Hugo award-winning science fiction stories
(including this one), but he was also the author of many acclaimed works in
horror and fantasy. Last year, I reviewed his horror/urban fantasy novel Conjure Wife, which may soon get its 4th film adaptation. The styles of Conjure
Wife and The Big Time are so
different that they seem almost written by different people. I think that Conjure Wife was written more for wide appeal, which could be one
of the reasons why it has been adapted to film so often. The Big Time, on the other hand,
is a very unusual book, and one that I could see having a smaller audience
through the years.
My Thoughts:
I think that Leiber’s background in
theatre is evident in The Big Time. It is very easy to imagine the story
being performed on stage, and—unless you wanted to do something elaborate with
the alien costumes—I don’t think it would even be an especially expensive
production. The set and various
prop pieces are very clearly described (as such) by the narrator, and the
entire story takes place in a single location (called the Place). The story is tightly bounded in time,
as well, telling the events of a short period in the lives of Greta, the other
entertainers, and a small group of time soldiers. The eventual mystery and its resolution are paced well, and
I appreciated that the reader is actually given all the clues to solve the
mystery on their own. As in a
play, most of the surface plot of the story is told through visual description
and dialogue. I liked how Leiber
gave each of the characters a distinct style of speech, reflecting their home time
period, but I thought that it sometimes sounded a little too stilted. I feel like the dialogue might come
across better in a well-performed audiobook, or in a conversion of the story to
stage drama.
The strong personality of the
first-person narrator, Greta Forzane, might be a major factor in whether or not
one enjoys the novel. She’s '29 and a party girl', and she tells her story in a very casual and
conversational way. Here’s an
example of some of her early exposition:
“…you are not likely to meet
me in the cosmos, because (bar Basin Street and the Prater) 15th Century Italy
and Augustan Rome—until they spoiled it—are my favorite (Ha!) vacation spots
and, as I have said, I stick as close to the Place as I can. It is really the
nicest Place in the whole Change World. (Crisis! I even think of it
capitalized!)
Anyhoo, when this thing started, I was
twiddling my thumbs on the couch nearest the piano and thinking it was too late
to do my fingernails and whoever came in probably wouldn't notice them anyway.” ~Chapter 1
To me, Greta seems pretty immature and
ditzy, but I don’t think that would be a fair assessment of her character in
total. She seems to strive to
diminish herself in order to care for others more. She doesn’t really have strong opinions or convictions
(except that the Surgery room is awful), and thus frames most situations in
terms of how they affect the people around her. Her behavior and style of
narration make her seem kind of empty-headed, but she proves to have pretty
good reasoning skills. It seemed
almost as if her self-dismissive party-girl persona was designed to keep her
focused on her work and distracted from thinking too seriously about her life.
The different ways Greta and the other
characters cope with their strange lives is what lies behind most of the
conflict of the novel. All of the
characters have been permanently removed from their natural timelines to fight
a war that seems to have no end or final goal. They know very little about either side, so they don’t even
know whether they’re fighting to achieve an outcome that they would consider
worthwhile. Regardless, the decisions made by the “Spiders” completely govern
the characters’ lives. They don’t even have control over their own minds, as
the actions of soldiers in the war alter their own memories of their
lives. Since they have essentially
no control over their own destiny, they are left in a continuing existence that
seems arbitrary and purposeless. The characters grapple with the facts of their
existence in their separate ways and consider whether an attempt at rebellion
is even a meaningful gesture. The exploration
of these reactions made the story much more compelling to me, but also considerably
bleaker.
My Rating: 3.5/5
The Big Time is a
very short novel, and one that I think I appreciated more than I enjoyed
reading it. The narrator, Greta,
with her exaggeratedly ditzy behavior and moments of clarity and insight, may
be a difficult character to like, and her personality colors the entire story. I think it’s a pretty common
observation that this novel is very influenced by principles of theatre, and
even that it would be very easy to convert this story into a relatively simple
theatre production. The basic plot
and eventual mystery moves along swiftly, with plenty of character-based
tension (prompted by circumstances).
However, the underlying existential crisis of the characters gives the
story a surprisingly depressing depth.
It’s definitely a strange novel, but I think I’m glad I gave it a
chance.
For more of a discussion of the philosophical content of the
novel, The Hugo Endurance Project has a good review here.
Hey thanks! Yeah for nearly finishing the GMRC too!
ReplyDeleteThis is a great review and I'm glad you gave this one a shot. I felt like you touched on a lot of the things I left out of my discussion. I think I might be one of very few who likes Greta's style and I'm really glad for the quote you picked. That "Anyhoo" part really got me for some reason as something that no other SF I'd read at the time had done and I'm so glad you picked that quote because it brought me right back. Her ultra-conversational tone struck me as such a lucid display of character despite her other flaws (though I didn't think of her as ditzy so much as placating the travelers). I think you're right on that her perspective, and the whole story, was a little strange but I thought it was fun (in spite of the bleakness) and distinct.
Super review. :D
Thanks! I thought your review was super, too. :) I haven't much studied philosophy, so I was very interested by your thoughts looking at the novel from that angle.
ReplyDeleteOn the quote, I was trying to pick one that would really show her personality and style, so I'm happy to hear it worked :). It took me a while to warm up to Greta, but I was impressed by how clearly her personality came through in her narration.